Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 52
Filter
1.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 561-567, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-990219

ABSTRACT

Objective:To apply the best evidence for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography or intervention to clinical practice and evaluate its effect.Methods:This was a quasi-experimental study. Based on the evidence continuous quality improvement model, evidence-based practice method was used to obtain the best evidence, formulated review indicators, analyzed the obstacles in the practice process and took action strategies. The 88 patients who underwent transradial coronary angiography or intervention in the Cardiology Department of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao) from June 1 to 30, 2020 were selected as the baseline review group by convenience sampling. The 94 patients who underwent this treatment from September 1 to 30, 2020 were selected as the evidence application group. The baseline review group used the original perioperative management plan, and the evidence application group used the perioperative management plan based on the best evidence. The implementation rate of each review indicator, the incidence of radial artery occlusion, the degree of compression pain, and the comfort level of patients were compared between the two groups.Results:The implementation rates of review indicators 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 in the evidence application group were 100.0% (94/94), 100.0% (94/94), 11.7(11/94), 88.3% (83/94), 100.0% (94/94), 100.0%(94/94), 85.1%(80/94), respectively, which were higher than those in the baseline review group(all 0), except for the review indicator 4, the differences were statistically significant ( χ2 values were 9.00-178.02, all P<0.05). The incidence of radial artery occlusion and the incidence of pain Numerical Rating Scale>3 points in the evidence application group were 2.1% (2/94) and 3.2% (3/94), respectively, which were lower than 14.8% (13/88) and 23.9% (21/88) in the baseline review group; the comfort level of patients in the evidence application group was 96.8% (91/94), which was higher than 63.6% (56/88) in the baseline review group. The differences were statistically significant ( χ2 = 8.01, 15.21, 30.10, all P<0.05). Conclusions:The best evidence for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography or intervention can be applied to clinical practice, which can standardize the behavior of medical staff, reduce the incidence of postoperative radial artery occlusion, reduce the degree of compression pain, and improve the comfort of patients.

2.
J. vasc. bras ; 22: e20210212, 2023. graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1514457

ABSTRACT

Abstract Transradial access is associated with fewer access site-related complications, earlier patient mobilization, and greater postprocedural comfort. Pseudoaneurysms are an extremely rare complication after transradial procedures and the radial artery itself is the most atypical arterial site of occurrence. We report a case in which a non-surgical, non-invasive, simple, and effective solution (prolonged pneumatic compression) was used to manage a radial artery pseudoaneurysm, a very rare and challenging complication of transradial procedures.


Resumo O acesso arterial transradial está associado a menos complicações relacionadas ao sítio de punção, com deambulação precoce do paciente e maior conforto pós-procedimento. O pseudoaneurisma é uma complicação extremamente rara após procedimentos transradiais, sendo a artéria radial, por si só, o sítio mais incomum para tal ocorrência. Relata-se um caso de um pseudoaneurisma de artéria radial, uma complicação rara e desafiadora, resolvido com êxito e de maneira simples, não invasiva e não cirúrgica (compressão pneumática prolongada).

3.
Chinese Journal of Neurology ; (12): 939-944, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-994918

ABSTRACT

Compared with the traditional transfemoral approach, the transradial approach (TRA) can be used as a new alternative approach in the diagnosis and treatment of neurointervention, and has more advantages in reducing access site complications, improving the comfort of patients, shortening the length of hospital stay, and reducing the overall medical costs, so it has attracted clinical attention. This article mainly reviews the application of TRA in the field of neurointerventional diagnosis and treatment, as well as its advantages, complications and other aspects, and puts forward its application prospects in the field of neurointerventional diagnosis and treatment, so as to provide reference for the development of this technology in the field of neurointerventional diagnosis and treatment and further research in this field.

4.
Arch. cardiol. Méx ; 92(4): 541-544, Oct.-Dec. 2022. graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1429691

ABSTRACT

Abstract A 53-year-old man with an asymptomatic fistula from the Vieussens ring to the pulmonary artery presented with progressive respiratory distress. Coil embolization of this type of fistula has been described by femoral access. The advanced transradial "grandmother-mother-son" technique for high active support safely allows successful embolization of this type of coronary fistulae.


Resumen Un hombre de 53 años con una fístula asintomática del anillo de Vieussens a la arteria pulmonar comenzó con dificultad respiratoria progresiva. La embolización con coils de este tipo de fístulas ha sido descrita por acceso femoral. La técnica transradial avanzada "abuela-madre-hijo" para un alto soporte activo permite de manera segura la embolización exitosa de este tipo fístulas coronarias.

5.
Indian Heart J ; 2022 Aug; 74(4): 338-339
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-220922

ABSTRACT

Distal transradial access for vascular interventions has gained ground recently. While the novel approach is associated with reduced radial artery occlusion and faster hemostasis, it could be related with prolonged procedural time, higher crossover rate and increased radiation, comparing to conventional transradial approach. Whether the radiation is increased in the procedures performed by the novel approach remains unambiguous. In the specific article, we aim to review the current literature and to propose possible explanations for this phenomenon. Could radiation be the Achilles’ heel of distal transradial artery access?

6.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-225765

ABSTRACT

A diagnostic cerebral angiography is a vital tool in the planning and management of various cerebrovascular conditions. Newer angiographic modalities, such as digital subtraction angiography offers dynamic imaging of the cerebral blood flow and is the preferred diagnostic modality of choice when a subsequent intervention is contemplated. Traditionally, the transfemoral route at the groin was used as the site for vascular access. However, landmark randomised controlled trials in the field of interventional cardiology have demonstrated the safety, efficacy and patient comfort attained by employing a trans-radial access for angiography and interventions. This has spawned numerous studies which were directed explicitly towards cerebral angiography and neuro-intervention. We present this review of literature to consolidate the current practices and to encourage the neuro-interventionalists to shift to a radial first approach.

7.
Rev. cuba. invest. bioméd ; 41: e2226, 2022. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1408609

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Introducción: En los últimos años la utilización de la vía radial como forma de acceso para la realización de estudios diagnósticos e intervencionista ha cobrado mayor importancia e interés dentro de los servicios de cardiología intervencionista a nivel mundial. Nuestro país no escapa de este auge por la baja tasa de complicación y la mayor comodidad para el paciente. Objetivo: Caracterizar la intervención coronaria percutánea mediante la vía de acceso radial en pacientes atendidos en el Instituto de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular. Método: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, transversal. Muestra compuesta por 211 pacientes a los que se les realizó intervencionismo coronario percutáneo mediante la vía de acceso radial. Resultados: Predominó el sexo masculino (61,2 %). La edad media fue 60,1 ± 9,8 años. El Síndrome Coronario Crónico (76,3 %) fue el diagnóstico mayoritario, la hipertensión arterial el factor de riesgo más frecuente (73,9 %) y entre los antecedentes personales la cardiopatía isquémica (30,3 %). El intervencionismo de forma electiva se realizó en el 76,3 de los casos, utilizando la vía radial derecha en el 88,2 %. Se demostró enfermedad de 2 y 3 vasos en el 45,1 % de los pacientes. El proceder fue exitoso en el 96,7 % de los pacientes. Las variables que demostraron relación estadísticamente significativa con el fracaso fueron: fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo < 40 % (p= 0.0001), filtrado glomerular ≤ 60 ml/min (p= 0.002), antecedente de cardiopatía isquémica (p= 0.016) y presencia de enfermedad coronaria de 3 vasos (p= 0.019). Conclusiones: La intervención coronaria percutánea mediante el acceso radial en el ICCCV es segura y eficaz, con una tasa de éxito elevada y escasas complicaciones.


ABSTRACT Introduction: In recent years the use of the radial approach as a form of access for diagnostic and interventional studies has become increasingly important and of interest in interventional cardiology services worldwide. Our country has not escaped this boom due to the low complication rate and greater patient comfort. Objective: To characterise percutaneous coronary intervention using the radial access route in patients attended at the Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. The sample consisted of 211 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial access route. Results: Male sex predominated (61.2%). Mean age was 60.1 ± 9.8 years. Chronic coronary syndrome (76.3%) was the most common diagnosis, hypertension the most frequent risk factor (73.9%) and ischaemic heart disease (30.3%). Elective intervention was performed in 76.3% of cases, using the right radial approach in 88.2%. Two- and three-vessel disease was demonstrated in 45.1% of patients. The procedure was successful in 96.7% of patients. Variables demonstrating statistically significant relationship with failure were: left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% (p= 0.0001), glomerular filtration rate ≤ 60 ml/min (p= 0.002), history of ischaemic heart disease (p= 0.016) and presence of 3-vessel coronary artery disease (p= 0.019). Conclusions: Percutaneous coronary intervention via radial access in ICCCV is safe and effective, with a high success rate and few complications.

8.
Acta méd. peru ; 38(1): 58-63, ene.-mar 2021. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1278194

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN El abordaje transradial está ganando territorio en el campo neuroendovascular para procedimientos diagnósticos y terapéuticos. Menos complicaciones, menor tiempo hospitalario y mayor confort del paciente son características de este abordaje. Sin embargo, la transición del abordaje femoral clásico al abordaje radial es difícil de lograr en instituciones con protocolos establecidos. Presentamos nuestra experiencia inicial utilizando el abordaje transradial para angiografía cerebral diagnóstica realizados exitosamente logrando la cateterización de todos los vasos supra-aórticos.


ABSTRACT The transradial approach for diagnostic cerebral angiography is aiming to become the standard technique in the neuroendovascular field for both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Some characteristics for this approach include less complications, shorter hospital stay and more comfort for patients. However, transitioning from the classical femoral approach to the radial approach is difficult to achieve in facilities with well-established protocols. We report our initial experience using the transradial approach for diagnostic cerebral angiography, where all supraaortic blood vessels were successfully catheterized.

9.
Rev. cuba. invest. bioméd ; 39(2): e441, abr.-jun. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1126591

ABSTRACT

Objective: to share our experience in the radial distal approach to perform coronary angiography and / or dilation of coronary stenosis. The initial results are exposed in the access of the distal radial artery or in the so-called anatomical "snuff box". Methods: The left or right radial distal artery was used as an access site in 6 patients admitted to the Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery for coronary angiography and dilatation of coronary stenosis between May 6 and June 6 of 2019. All with pulse present in their distal radial artery. In the laboratory, they had the access arm flexed with respect to the homolateral shoulder so that the hand was placed on their contralateral groin. In all cases, the operator was placed on the right side of the patient, to perform coronary angiography and / or dilation of coronary stenosis. During the hospital stay, the main demographic characteristics and complications were recorded. Results: the average age of the patients was 72 +/- 10 years and 83.3 percent were men. We use the Judkins and Amplatz 6 and 5 French catheters for the procedures. Five admitted with the diagnosis of angina and one with severe aortic valve stenosis. In 5 patients, distal transradial coronary angiography was successfully performed. Only one patient experienced distal radial spasm, using in this case the ipsilateral proximal radial access, without making it necessary to approach the femoral artery. In total, 4 patients had coronary intervention, performing successfully in the 4 patients. The right coronary artery was the artery that required most of the intervention (3 patients). There were no cases of occlusion of the radial arteries, no hematoma of the hand, of the B.A.R.C scale greater than 1 was observed in any patient. Numbness of the hand was documented in none. The radial introducer was removed at the end of the procedure. Hemostasis was achieved with manual compression. Conclusion: the distal radial approach is feasible in a selected group of patients as a procedure for coronary angiography and dilatation of coronary stenosis(AU)


Objetivo: compartir nuestra experiencia en el abordaje radial distal para realizar la angiografía coronaria y/o la dilatación de la estenosis coronaria. Se exponen los resultados iniciales en el acceso de la arteria radial distal o en la llamada "tabaquera" anatómica. Métodos: se utilizó la arteria radial distal izquierda o derecha como sitio de acceso en 6 pacientes ingresados en el Instituto de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular para angiografía coronaria y dilatación de estenosis coronaria del 6 de mayo al 6 de junio de 2019. Todos los pacientes tenían pulso en la arteria radial distal. En el laboratorio, se les flexionó el brazo de acceso con respecto al hombro homolateral de modo que la mano descansara sobre la ingle contralateral. En todos los casos, el técnico se situó a la derecha del paciente para realizar la angiografía coronaria y/o dilatación de la estenosis coronaria. Durante la estancia de los pacientes en el hospital, se registraron sus principales características demográficas y complicaciones. Resultados: la edad promedio de los pacientes fue de 72 +/- 10 años y 83,3 por ciento eran hombres. Usamos catéteres franceses Judkins y Amplatz 6 y 5 para los procedimientos. Cinco pacientes habían sido ingresados con un diagnóstico de angina y uno con estenosis valvular aórtica severa. La angiografía coronaria transradial distal fue exitosa en 5 pacientes. Solo un paciente experimentó un espasmo distal radial, usándose en ese caso el acceso radial proximal ipsilateral sin que fuera necesario abordar la arteria femoral. Un total de 4 pacientes se sometieron a intervención coronaria, la que fue exitosa en los 4. La arteria coronaria derecha fue la que requirió la mayor parte de la intervención (3 pacientes). No hubo ningún caso de oclusión de las arterias radiales ni de hematoma de la mano. Tampoco se observó un valor de la escala BARC mayor de 1 en ningún paciente. No se documentó entumecimiento de la mano en ningún paciente. El introductor radial se retiró al final del procedimiento. La hemostasia se alcanzó mediante compresión manual. Conclusión: el abordaje radial distal es factible en un grupo seleccionado de pacientes como procedimiento para la angiografía coronaria y la dilatación de la estenosis coronaria(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Pulse , Coronary Angiography/methods , Aortic Valve Stenosis/therapy
10.
Philippine Journal of Internal Medicine ; : 161-164, 2020.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-961216

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#This report aims to raise physician clinical awareness of radial artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) and promote early recognition of this potentially serious complication. The article highlights various proposed treatment strategies in the management of this condition. @*BACKGROUND@#Radial artery pseudoaneurysm is a rare potentially serious complication following transradial artery coronary angiography for left heart catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. Risk factors associated with the development of RAP include multiple arterial puncture attempts, use of systemic anticoagulation, inadequate hemostasis following post-procedural compression, vascular site infection, use of larger sheaths, female gender, age of 70 years and older, diabetes mellitus, obesity and/or patients with high body mass index.1-3 Conservative medical treatment and/or surgical repair are the primary therapeutic approaches in the management of RAP. @*CONCLUSION@#Transradial artery access is associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding and vascular access site complications, reduces morbidity and mortality compared with the transfemoral approach. It is important to recognize though that complications do still occur with the transradial approach. RAP is one such entity wherein prevention is key - with adequate post-procedural compression, frequent observation, and careful assessment of the radial access site.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm, False , Radial Artery
11.
Arch. cardiol. Méx ; 89(2): 160-166, Apr.-Jun. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1142177

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: The objective of the study was to describe the feasibility of single catheter intervention using the transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background: The transradial approach for PCIs has fewer vascular events and complications and lower mortality rate. However, complications can result from forearm artery tortuosity, a longer learning curve and artery spasm that can complicate, delay and impede coronary artery interventions. The latter is usually exacerbated by the changing and manipulation of catheters. Methods: We performed a study using a single catheter on patients undergoing coronary assessment and treatment. Procedural outcomes including success, procedural time, bleeding, access site complications, and contrast used were all analyzed. Results: We included 327 patients, of whom 70% were male. The mean age was 63.3 ± 11.1 years, mean height was 165.9 ± 7.7 cm, mean weight was 73.3 ± 11.3 kg, and mean body index was 26.5 ± 3.5 kg/m2. Contrast use averaged 158.5 ± 60.5 ml. Three vessels were treated in 3% of all cases, two vessels in 32%, and one vessel in 65%. Procedural success was achieved in 94.5% of the cases. A second catheter was required in 9 cases (2.7%), and crossover to the femoral approach was performed in 9 cases (2.7%) due to a lack of support, artery spasm, difficult anatomy, or the need for a larger catheter. Three complications were related to access, including a Class 2 hematoma that was treated conservatively with no further complications. Conclusions: Our study showed that using a single catheter to perform both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures has a higher success rate, lower spasm incidence, and fewer complications than reported in literature.


Resumen Objetivo: Describir la factibilidad del uso de un solo catéter en el intervencionismo coronario percutáneo por vía transradial. Antecedentes: El abordaje transradial en las intervenciones coronarias ha mostrado menores eventos cardiovasculares y complicaciones, y menor mortalidad. Sin embargo, algunos eventos adversos pueden resultar por trotuosidad de las arterias del brazo, curva de aprendizaje más larga o espasmo arterial que puede complicar, retardar o impedir la intervención coronaria. Ésta última es usualmente exacerbada por el intercambio de catéteres o la manipulación de los mismos. Métodos: Realizamos un studio utilizando un solo catéter en pacientes sometidos a coronariografía e intervención coronaria. Los desenlaces del procedimiento incluyendo éxito, tiempo de procedimiento, sangrado, complicaciones en el sitio de acceso y uso de medio de contraste fueron analizados. Resultados: Incluimos 327 pacientes, 70% de los cuales fueron varones. La edad promedio fue de 63.3 ± 11.1 años, la estatura promedio fue de 165.9 ± 7.7 cm, peso promedio de 73.3 ± 11.3 kg y el índice de masa corporal promedio de 26.5 ± 3.5 kg/m2. El contraste utilizado promedio fue 158.5 ± 60.5 ml. El total de vasos tratados fue de tres en 3% de los casos, dos en 32% de los casos y uno en 65%. El éxito del procedimiento fue logrado en 94.5% de los pacientes No obstante, un Segundo catéter fue requerido en 9 intervenciones (2.7%), y cambio en la vía de acceso fue realizado en 9 casos (2.7%) por falta de apoyo, espasmo arterial, anatomía dificil o necesidad de un catéter de mayor lumen. Tres complicaciones asociadas al sitio de acceso incluyendo un hematoma clase 2 fueron registradas el cual se trató conservadoramente. Conclusiones: Nuestro estudio mostró que el uso de un catéter único para realizar tanto procedimientos diagnósticos como terapéuticos tiene una tasa de éxito mayor, con menor incidencia de espasmo y complicaciones reportadas en la literatura.


Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Radial Artery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Cardiac Catheters , Coronary Artery Disease/pathology , Feasibility Studies
12.
Indian Heart J ; 2019 Mar; 71(2): 136-142
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-191710

ABSTRACT

Background The transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (TRA-PCI) reduces vascular complications compared with the transfemoral approach (TFA). Although hematoma formation is less frequent with the TRA than TFA, it is not uncommon, and its presentation ranges from mild hematoma to compartment syndrome. Incidence and predictors of hematoma have not been well studied. Methods and results The present study was conducted to prospectively evaluate the incidence and predictors of forearm hematoma after TRA-PCI. The study population consisted of consecutive patients undergoing TRA-PCI. Baseline and procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected. All patients were observed for forearm/arm hematoma immediately after procedure, after band removal, before discharge, and whenever the patient complained of pain/swelling in the limb. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors for hematoma formation. A total of 520 patients who had successfully completed TRA-PCI were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 55.2 ± 9.5 years, and 24% patients were women. Hematoma occurred in 53 (10.2%) patients. Hematomas were of grade I, II, III, and IV in 22 (4.2%), 9 (1.7%), 18 (3.5%), and 4 (0.8%) patients, respectively. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, age, body mass index, multiple puncture attempt, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker use, nonclopidogrel agent use for dual antiplatelet therapy, and multiple catheter exchanges emerged as independent predictors for hematoma formation. Conclusions Forearm hematoma following TRA-PCI occurs in about 10% patients. Most hematomas occur near the puncture area. The independent predictors for hematoma formation are age, body mass index, multiple puncture attempts, intensive antiplatelet therapy, and multiple catheter exchanges.

13.
Indian Heart J ; 2018 Nov; 70(6): 922-933
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-191643

ABSTRACT

Radial access for cardiac catheterization and intervention in India has been growing steadily over the last decade with favorable clinical outcomes. However, its usage by interventional cardiologists varies greatly among Indian operators and hospitals due to large geographic disparities in health care delivery systems and practice patterns. It also remains unclear whether the advantages, as well as limitations of transradial (TR) intervention (as reported in the western literature), are applicable to developing countries like India or not. An evidence-based review involving various facets of radial procedure for cardiac catheterization, including practical, patient-related and technical issues was conducted by an expert committee that formed a part of Advancing Complex CoronariES Sciences through TransRADIAL intervention (ACCESS RADIAL™) Advisory Board. Emerging challenges in redefining TR management based on evidence supporting practices were discussed to formulate these final recommendations through consensus.

14.
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine ; : 716-726, 2018.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-716075

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Transradial intervention (TRI) is becoming the preferred method over transfemoral intervention (TFI) because TRI is associated with lower incidence of major bleeding and vascular complications. However, there has been limited published data regarding the clinical outcomes of TRI versus TFI in Korean patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: A total of 689 consecutive STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs) from January to December of 2009 at nine university hospitals were enrolled in this study. Mid-term angiographic and 12-month cumulative clinical outcomes of the TRI group (n = 220, 31.9%) were compared to those of the TFI group (n = 469, 28.1%). RESULTS: After propensity score matching, in-hospital complications and the 12-month major clinical outcomes during follow-up in the two groups were similar to each other. However, the incidence rates of repeat revascularization (6.4% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.003), target vessel revascularization (6.4% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.003), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE; 11.6% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.018) in the TFI group were higher than those in the TRI group during the 12-month of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, TRI in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with DESs was associated with lower incidence of access site hematoma, 12-month repeat revascularization, and MACE compared to TFI. Therefore, TRI might play an important role in reducing bleeding complications while improving major clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with DESs.


Subject(s)
Humans , Drug-Eluting Stents , Follow-Up Studies , Hematoma , Hemorrhage , Hospitals, University , Incidence , Methods , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Propensity Score
15.
Chinese Circulation Journal ; (12): 958-963, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-703909

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This study sought to compare both the safety and efficacy of transradial (TRI) versus transfemoral (TFI) approach in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in China. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 5 067 women undergoing PCI in Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China between 2006 and 2011. 4 105 patients underwent TRI and 962 patients underwent TFI. A One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control for potential biases. A total of 897 pairs were matched. Results: After controlling for confounders using PSM, baseline and procedural characteristics were well-balanced between TRI and TFI groups. Patients undergoing TRI had significantly fewer major post-PCI bleeding (1.0% vs 3.5%, P<0.001) and access site complications (8.5% vs 19.7%,P<0.001) after PSM. There was no statistical differences in the incidence rates of major adverse cardiac events (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) during hospitalization (P>0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that TRI was an independent predictor of reduced major bleeding (OR=0.64, 95%CI: 0.54-0.76, P<0.001) and access site complications (OR=0.67, 95%CI:0.61-0.74, P<0.001). Conclusions: Our result show that TRI is related to reduced major bleeding and access site complications as compared to TFI in Chinese female patients undergoing PCI.

16.
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology ; (4): 100-105, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-702321

ABSTRACT

Objective To discuss the incidence and clinical predictor factors of anatomical variation of radial arteries among patients in the XingJing province of China. Methods A total of 1731 patients who underwent transradial coronary intervention for the first time during the period of Jan.2016-June.2016 in the People‵s Hospital of Xin jiang Uyghur Autonomous Region were enrolled in this study. All relevant basic information and related medical history were recorded in detail.Right radial artery angiography was performed in all patients, According to the definition of radial artery variation, the patients were decided into the radial artery variation group and the normal radial artery group. Single factor and multiple factors logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate the predictive value of variables factors in radial artery variations. Results The incidence of radial artery variation was 4.97%(86/1731).The incidence of radial artery spasm in the radial artery variation group33.72%(29/86),and 2.74% (45/1645) in the normal radial artery group (P<0.001).The failure rate of coronary intervanton by right radial artery in the radial artery variation group was 26.74%(23/86)and 1.51%(25/1645)in the normal radial artery group(P<0.001).The overall success rate of coronary intervention through right radial artery approach was 97.23%(1683/1731).Female gender,short statue、low body weight,history hyperlipidemia,smoking,drinking rabbit,occupation as farmer were found to be associated with the existence of radial artery variation (all P < 0.05).Diabetes,body mass index,hyperlipidemia and ethnicity were not associated with the existence of radial artery variation (all P >0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed age, gender, farmer occupation, hyperlipidemia were associated with the occurrence of radial artery variation. Increased in age by every 10 years would bring a 0.264 fold increase in risk of radial artery variation(OR 1.264,95%CI 1.006-1.587, P=0.044)and the risk of radial artery variation in females was 3.999 times to males(OR 3.999, 95%CI 2.241-7.136,P<0.001).The risk of radial artery variation in patients with hyperlipidemia was 1.776 times to patients without hyperlipidemia(OR 1.776,95%CI 1.011-3.122,P=0.046)and the risk of radial artery variation in farmers was 2.188 times higher than others(OR 2.188,95%CI 1.238-3.867, P=0.007). Conclusions For people in Xinjiang in China,anatomical variation of radial artery was uncommon. Advanced age, female gender, short states, low body weight, hyperlipidemia, smoking, drinking and farmer occupation were associated with the occurrence of radial artery variation. Multivariates logistic regression analysis showed advanced age, female gender, hyperlipidemia, farmers were associated whit the presence of radial artery variation. These factors have predictive value for the existence of radial artery variation.

17.
Journal of Interventional Radiology ; (12): 281-284, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-694253

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the application of evidence - based perioperative nursing in transradial interventional treatment by using sheathless guiding-catheter for coronary artery lesions. Methods The evidence-based nursing team researched for the relevant literature and evidences. According to the theory of critical evidence - based nursing, evidence - based perioperative nursing measures were carried out for 30 patients with coronary artery diseases who were receiving transradial interventional treatment by using sheathless guiding-catheter. Results The success rate of puncturing was 100%. After the procedure only two patients developed radial artery complications, and after promptly treatment no severe consequences occurred. The treatment achieved the desired clinical results. Conclusion Evidence-based nursing measures can regulate nursing behavior, and presciently make the nursing work in a standardized and sequenced way, thus, the nursing work is changed from the passive mode to an active mode. Therefore, evidence - based perioperative nursing is worth of clinical application(J Intervent Radiol, 2018, 27:281 -284)

18.
Journal of Interventional Radiology ; (12): 207-210, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-694237

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the safety, reliability and effectiveness of supra - aortic artery stenting angioplasty via transradial access in treating supra-aortic artery occlusion or stenosis. Methods The clinical data of 325 consecutive patients with supra-aortic artery occlusion or stenosis, who were admitted to authors' hospital during the period from January 2012 to January 2016 to receive stenting angioplasty, were retrospectively analyzed. According to patient's own will, the 325 patients were divided into transradial access group (n=52) and transfemoral access group (n=273). The results of the puncturing, the operative results, the duration of operation, the amount of intraoperative blood loss, the postoperative complications, the time of postoperative rest in bed, the average time of hospitalization of both groups were recorded. Results No statistically significant differences in the success rate of puncturing, the success rate of operation and the amount of intraoperative blood loss existed between the two groups (P>0. 05). In 73. 1% of patients (38/52) of the transradial access group the duration of operation was ≤30 min, while only in 43. 2% of patients (118/ 273) of the transfemoral access group the duration of operation was ≤30 min, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0. 000 1). After the operation, in transradial access group puncture point bleeding was seen in 8 patients and hematoma at the puncture site in one patient, the complication rate was 17. 3% (9/52), while in transfemoral access group puncture point bleeding was observed in 23 patients, hematoma at the puncture site in 7 patients, pain of puncture site in one patient, and cerebral hemorrhage in one patient, the total complication rate was 11. 7% (32/273); but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (χ2=1. 236, P=0. 266). Patients in the transradial access group could get out of bed immediately after the operation. No statistically significant difference in the average time of hospitalization existed between the two groups (P>0. 05). Conclusion In performing endovascular stenting angioplasty for supra-aortic artery occlusion or stenosis, both transradial access and transfemoral access are safe, reliable and effective. Transradial access can be used as a replacement of transfemoral access. (J Intervent Radiol, 2018, 27:207-210)

19.
Journal of Interventional Radiology ; (12): 399-402, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-619334

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of prostatic artery embolization (PAE)via transradial approach in treating prostatic hyperplasia.Methods The clinical data of 18 patients with prostatic hyperplasia,who received C-arm CT-guided PAE via left or right radial artery access,were retrospectively analyzed.The following indexes were recorded:arterial spasm and injury of upper limbs,incidence of puncture point bleeding,postoperative radial artery pulse and congestion,blood supply and nerve injury of fingers,the surgical success rate,incidence of perioperative cerebral vascular complications,operation time,radiation dose and clinical curative effect.Results Among the 18 patients,PAE via left radial artery access was employed in 14,and PAE via right radial artery access was performed in 4.Bilateral PAE was carried out in 16 patients,and only unilateral PAE was able to be successfully accomplished in 2 patients as the prostatic artery opening of the other side was tortuous with stenosis.After PAE,decreased radial pulse was observed in one patient and ultrasound examination revealed decreased blood flow.The operation time ranged from 96 min to 245 min.The radiation dose received by the patient varied from 2435 mGy to 4958 mGy with a mean of (3342±156) mGy,which was not significantly different from the radiation dose received by the patients who underwent PAE via femoral artery access during the same study period (P=0.1167).Conclusion In treating prostatic hyperplasia,PAE by using transradial approach is clinically safe and technically feasible.

20.
Chinese Journal of General Surgery ; (12): 750-753, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-660413

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) via right transradial approach (TRA).Methods A retrospective analysis was made on 46 cases undergoing the CAS via right TRA.Patients were divided into the right carotid artery group (RCA),bovine left carotid artery group (B-LCA),nonbovine carotid artery group (NB-LCA) according to the lesion location.Low TRA or high TRA were selected to overcome the difficulties of insufficient supporting power,using techniques such as catheter looping and retrograde engagement technique(CLRET).Results CAS were successful in all cases (100%),the differences of the operation time and fluoroscopy time among RCA group,B-LCA group and NB-LCA group were not significant.In NB-LCA group,CLRET were applied in 10 cases (55.56%,10/18),includeing 8 cases with type Ⅲ aortic arch(100%,8/8)and 2 cases with type Ⅱ aortic arch (33.33%,2/6).The CLRET prolonged the operation time and fluoroscopy time [(39.45 ±7.27) min vs.(30.80±4.66) min;(11.84 ± 2.05) min vs.(9.91 ± 1.45) min,P <0.05).There was no cerebrovascular events and puncture point complications in perioperative period.Conclusion Right transradial approach for carotid artery stenting is safe and technically feasible,especially in RCA stenosis and LCA stenosis with type Ⅰ or Ⅱ aortic arch.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL